I'm pretty sure this used to be on IMDb’s top 250; that's
most likely how I took notice of it. Nowadays it stands out as having the first
major role for Rory Culkin. It's also the earliest I've seen of Mark Ruffalo
and the latest I've seen of Matthew Broderick.
The opening establishes Samantha and Terry as having been
orphaned when Sammy was a teen and Terry a bit younger. After a fast-forward, Sammy
(Laura Linney) is a single mother of eight-year-old Rudy (Culkin). Her new boss
at the bank (Broderick) is not very sympathetic to her need to leave early. But
as luck would have it, Terry (Ruffalo) shows up just in time…to ask for money.
Sammy makes him feel guilty for not replying to her letters for six months, so
he agrees to stick around and help take care of his nephew. As you can imagine,
the title is ironic.
Frankly, the opening, tho often credited as powerful, is
so awkward in the gestalt that I would've cut it altogether. It shows us little
of the characters' early lives. As far as I can tell, it matters to the rest of
the story only insofar as it explains why Sammy cares about Terry so much. I do
not take it to explain their future personalities, which hardly developed in
the same direction. Adding to the awkwardness, there appears to be a third
sibling who never rates a mention again, unless that's just a visiting friend.
Either way, his sole purpose is to allow for a brief exchange with Terry indicating
that teen Sammy smokes weed. Yeah, that
tells us a lot.
But enough about those first few minutes. The rest of the
movie is dominated by Terry being a rather lousy manchild. (Mom, if you still
have a crush on Ruffalo, don’t watch this.) Rudy mostly likes him, probably for
treating him almost like an adult, but you can imagine some of the trouble that
causes. Prepare for plenty of swearing, which thankfully doesn't rub off on
Rudy. Terry even smokes right next to him in the bedroom at night.
To the fairly religious Sammy, this behavior is hard to
tolerate. She does have her own vices, most obviously when she violates a
commandment with her boss, which Terry will gladly throw in her face when she
gets on his case. The titular irony might apply to both of them. But if we're to understand that they're anywhere close to
equally bad authority figures, writer-director Kenneth Lonergan fails on that
part. At least Sammy keeps her problems a secret from Rudy, so she's probably
not a bad influence on him.
The film succeeds most in credibility, convenient timing
notwithstanding. Not only can I believe what happens on the whole, but the
dialog features plenty of mid-sentence pauses as if the characters improvised.
And they face emotional communication issues that I rarely see handled on
screen, in a way that I might just accept as about equal in fault distribution.
I'm not sure what year the bulk of the story takes place.
The bank's computers evoke the '80s or early '90s, but it's just possible that
a minor bank in a backwater town would still use them in 2000. That present
does feel surprisingly old now; a lot of moments wouldn't have happened in the
era of omnipresent cellphones.
No comments:
Post a Comment